I found this on USA Today and thought it was pretty interesting.
____________
As President Obama raised campaign money in Miami last night, his office blasted out an e-mail that heralded a major expansion of rights for gay Americans.
Obama ordered hospitals to grant visitation rights to same-sex couples, and honor the requests of gay patients who want their partners to help make major medical decisions.
The order also covers close friends and co-religionists.
"For all of these Americans, the failure to have their wishes respected concerning who may visit them or make medical decisions on their behalf has real consequences," Obama wrote in a memo to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.
The Human Rights Campaign praised the order as a victory for all Americans. The Family Research Council denounced it as pandering to a special interest group.
Here are some excerpts from the president's memo:
There are few moments in our lives that call for greater compassion and companionship than when a loved one is admitted to the hospital. In these hours of need and moments of pain and anxiety, all of us would hope to have a hand to hold, a shoulder on which to lean -- a loved one to be there for us, as we would be there for them.
Yet every day, all across America, patients are denied the kindnesses and caring of a loved one at their sides -- whether in a sudden medical emergency or a prolonged hospital stay. Often, a widow or widower with no children is denied the support and comfort of a good friend. Members of religious orders are sometimes unable to choose someone other than an immediate family member to visit them and make medical decisions on their behalf. Also uniquely affected are gay and lesbian Americans who are often barred from the bedsides of the partners with whomthey may have spent decades of their lives -- unable to be there for the person they love, and unable to act as a legal surrogate if their partner is incapacitated.
For all of these Americans, the failure to have their wishes respected concerning who may visit them or make medical decisions on their behalf has real consequences. It means that doctors and nurses do not always have the best information about patients' medications and medical histories and that friends and certain family members are unable to serve as intermediaries to help communicate patients' needs. It means that a stressful and at times terrifying experience for patients is senselessly compounded by indignity and unfairness. And it means that all too often, people are made to suffer or even to pass away alone, denied the comfort of companionship in their final moments while a loved one is left worrying and pacing down the hall.
Friday, April 16, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I believe President Obama is definately bringing up an issue that most of us don't even think about. I actually work at UVRMC Hospital as a PCT (Personal care Technician), and during my time with different patients, it is easy to see many of the differient situations that affect them. I know that Intermountain doesn't deny gay couples from visiting each other, in fact, I have seen this often. However, I'm not sure about medical decisions. Part of the reason that hospitals are so picky about guests and medical rights are because of important safety reasons. There are certain bacteria such as antibiotic-resistant MRSA that require a patient to be on isolation precautions. There are certain laws that a hospital must follow when it comes to patient confidentiality and medical decision making, such as living wills or power of attorney. A lot of times, when a person is admitted to the hospital, they cannot think very clearly. These laws are restricted to family members only, because in most cases, they are the people who know the persons wishes and want the best for them. I believe that opening it up to the GLBT couples would be an acceptable idea since straight couples are allowed the privelage. However, there would be some safety issues and policies that would have to be enforced along with this idea as well, or it would seriously effect the patient and the hospitals well-being.
ReplyDelete