NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A Louisiana justice of the peace said he refused to issue a marriage license to an interracial couple out of concern for any children the couple might have. Keith Bardwell, justice of the peace in Tangipahoa Parish, says it is his experience that most interracial marriages do not last long.
"I'm not a racist. I just don't believe in mixing the races that way," Bardwell told the Associated Press on Thursday. "I have piles and piles of black friends. They come to my home, I marry them, they use my bathroom. I treat them just like everyone else."
Bardwell said he asks everyone who calls about marriage if they are a mixed race couple. If they are, he does not marry them, he said.
Bardwell said he has discussed the topic with blacks and whites, along with witnessing some interracial marriages. He came to the conclusion that most of black society does not readily accept offspring of such relationships, and neither does white society, he said.
"There is a problem with both groups accepting a child from such a marriage," Bardwell said. "I think those children suffer and I won't help put them through it."
If he did an interracial marriage for one couple, he must do the same for all, he said.
"I try to treat everyone equally," he said.
Bardwell estimates that he has refused to marry about four couples during his career, all in the past 2 1/2 years.
Beth Humphrey, 30, and 32-year-old Terence McKay, both of Hammond, say they will consult the U.S. Justice Department about filing a discrimination complaint.
Humphrey, an account manager for a marketing firm, said she and McKay, a welder, just returned to Louisiana. She is white and he is black. She plans to enroll in the University of New Orleans to pursue a masters degree in minority politics.
"That was one thing that made this so unbelievable," she said. "It's not something you expect in this day and age."
Humphrey said she called Bardwell on Oct. 6 to inquire about getting a marriage license signed. She says Bardwell's wife told her that Bardwell will not sign marriage licenses for interracial couples. Bardwell suggested the couple go to another justice of the peace in the parish who agreed to marry them.
"We are looking forward to having children," Humphrey said. "And all our friends and co-workers have been very supportive. Except for this, we're typical happy newlyweds."
"It is really astonishing and disappointing to see this come up in 2009," said American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana attorney Katie Schwartzmann. She said the Supreme Court ruled in 1967 "that the government cannot tell people who they can and cannot marry."
The ACLU sent a letter to the Louisiana Judiciary Committee, which oversees the state justices of the peace, asking them to investigate Bardwell and recommending "the most severe sanctions available, because such blatant bigotry poses a substantial threat of serious harm to the administration of justice."
"He knew he was breaking the law, but continued to do it," Schwartzmann said.
According to the clerk of court's office, application for a marriage license must be made three days before the ceremony because there is a 72-hour waiting period. The applicants are asked if they have previously been married. If so, they must show how the marriage ended, such as divorce.
Other than that, all they need is a birth certificate and Social Security card.
The license fee is $35, and the license must be signed by a Louisiana minister, justice of the peace or judge. The original is returned to the clerk's office.
"I've been a justice of the peace for 34 years and I don't think I've mistreated anybody," Bardwell said. "I've made some mistakes, but you have too. I didn't tell this couple they couldn't get married. I just told them I wouldn't do it."
Saturday, October 17, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I literally cannot believe that this still happens in the United States today. The Supreme Court outlawed this practice in 1967, so obviously he is breaking the law...period! Here are my thoughts on some of his statements:
ReplyDelete1. "I'm not a racist. I just don't believe in mixing the races that way"
This is a classic case of thinking about race as essentialistic in nature...notice how he says 'mixing the races' as if there are categories of races that are easily distinguishable...I hate to break it to him, but we are all mixed to some degree. I'm not even going to address his 'I'm not racist' comment, other than to say that most times I've heard that is sounds like a justification to some racist comment.
2. "It is his experience that most interracial marriages do not last long."
Based on an N of what? If anything interracial marriages don't last as long because of people like this...in other words, outside pressure.
3. "I have piles and piles of black friends."
Maybe I'm reading too much into this, but who refers to their friends as 'piles'?
4. "There is a problem with both groups accepting a child from such a marriage"
And instead of being a solution to this supposed problem he is instead part of it.
5. "I've been a justice of the peace for 34 years and I don't think I've mistreated anybody"
Other than blatantly discriminating against interracial couples!
Given that I am married to a Japanese woman and have interracial children I take great offense to this judge. I realize that he is talking about black/white couples, but my wife and I are still "mixing the races".
Well said Charlie! I was also shocked when I saw that this happened in 2009, which shows that in spite of the progress we have made there are still pervasive albeit subtle racist ideologies in contemporary America. People have a right to their opinions, but as a judge he still needs to act according to the law, not what he deems proper or improper without any legal basis.
ReplyDeleteIt is pretty crazy that something so outrageously racist could still happen today. I saw this story on CNN when it first was reported and the justice's wife wouldn't give the reporter an interview and then kicked them off the property. You'd think that if he wasn't racist or a little ashamed of his decision that he wouldn't mind talking about it a little. I think that it just goes to show you that the real issue is the justice's own sense of self. If he wasn't so insecure and petty then he wouldn't have to take it out on other people with slack-witted, backwoods justicification. For shame.
ReplyDeleteI think this guy is so full of himself and so caught up in his position as a judge that he thinks he's God. I mean really. He doesn't have the right to do any of that and he is obviously breaking a huge law that he swore to uphold. People like that are so ignorant. Stories like this happen which ruins everything others have tried to accomplish through the years. Will he get any sort of punishment I wonder?
ReplyDelete