Monday, September 26, 2011

Universities Seeking Out Students of Means

Universities Seeking Out Students of Means
By TAMAR LEWIN
Published: September 21, 2011

Money is talking a bit louder in college admissions these days, according to a survey to be released Wednesday by Inside Higher Ed, an online publication for higher education professionals.

More than half of the admissions officers at public research universities, and more than a third at four-year colleges said that they had been working harder in the past year to recruit students who need no financial aid and can pay full price, according to the survey of 462 admissions directors and enrollment managers conducted in August and early September.

Similarly, 22 percent of the admissions officials at four-year institutions said the financial downturn had led them to pay more attention in their decision to applicants’ ability to pay.

“As institutional pressures mount, between the decreased state funding, the pressure to raise a college’s profile, and the pressure to admit certain students, we’re seeing a fundamental change in the admissions process,” said David A. Hawkins, director of public policy and research at the National Association for College Admission Counseling. “Where many of the older admissions professionals came in through the institution and saw it as an ethically centered counseling role, there’s now a different dynamic that places a lot more emphasis on marketing.”

In the survey, 10 percent of the admissions directors at four-year colleges — and almost 20 percent at private liberal-arts schools — said that the full-pay students they were admitting, on average, had lower grades and test scores than other admitted applicants.

But they are not the only ones with an edge: the admissions officers said they admitted minority students, athletes, veterans, children of alumni, international students and, for the sake of gender balance, men, with lesser credentials, too.

At many colleges and universities, the survey found, whom you know does matter. More than a quarter of the admissions directors said they had felt pressure from senior-level administrators to admit certain applicants, and almost a quarter got pressure from trustees or development officers.

“If external parties are trying to influence admissions decisions, that’s a concern that strikes at the legitimacy of the whole process,” Mr. Hawkins said. “We certainly have standards, but there needs to be awareness that when the economy starts to crumble, the standards may start to go out the window.”

Lloyd Thacker, executive director of the Education Conservancy, a two-person nonprofit he founded in 2003 to improve college admissions, said the Inside Higher Ed findings were troubling.

“There’s always been elements of this behavior, but it seems to me that it’s growing,” Mr. Thacker said. “I don’t know whether to blame it on hard times or lack of courage and leadership.”

Mr. Thacker said his own research had found students becoming more cynical about higher education.

“Students say, ‘They’re cheating us, so we can cheat them,’ ” he said. “The cheat they see is that colleges are out for themselves, not for them as students. Our research, with 2,500 students, found that of all the sources of information students get about higher education, they thought the least trustworthy sources are the colleges and college reps themselves.”

While community colleges said their most important challenge in the near future was reduced state funding, all the other institutions named rising concerns from families about tuition and affordability.

Admissions directors at many public universities said in the survey that recruiting more out-of-state and international students, who pay higher tuition, was their top strategy. At community colleges and private institutions, admissions officers were more likely to say that providing aid for low- and middle- income students was their focus.

More than half the admissions officers from four-year institutions said that coaching by parents or college counselors was making it harder to really learn about applicants.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/21/education/21admissions.html?_r=2&ref=us

Since many colleges and universities are having hard time financially, they are accepting students who can pay full tuition without scholarship and student loan even if they have lower grades. Also, they are accepting minorities. Then what about normal students with decent grade but don't have enough money to pay full-tuition? Do parents' wealth still matter in childrens' education?

3 comments:

  1. It seems that if this is true, that this will widen the gap between the poor and the rich. It is hard to become wealthy without a college education. Those that are already rich will be able to pay for their kids to receive educations at the top universities for the sole reason that they have enough money to pay for it and not because there kids are smart enough to attend there. This is a huge disadvantage for kids who want college educations but cannot afford them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. We can clearly see how much influence economy has on the college education of future students. Reading this article makes me think about the difficulties my younger brothers will have to phase when applying to the college of their choice. Will scholarships decrease? will they be taken away? will there be a higher standard to receive these scholarships? I care so much because the only way I can stay in college is because of a scholarship I was thankfully granted. In my opinion the economy shouldn't influence a college's acceptance. Middle class students that have worked hard, wont be able to get the opportunity to attend a higher education. Or if they do they wont have a scholarship to help support them financially thus starting in debt and continuing the eternal climb to escape the gap between the poor and the rich. All students should be given a chance to succeed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What I found most interesting about this whole issue is that in the beginning they talked about the pressures of a college to raise their profile. Admitting students with lower test scores, grades, and academic accomplishments is going to help raise their profile? It seems to be completely contradictory to itself. Admitting students with lower credentials will not help a college's overall standing amongst other colleges. In addition, isn't the whole purpose of college to further education and create better career opportunities for its attendees? If colleges and universities are giving preference to those who are more than capable of financially supporting themselves, how is this helping those who need the additional education? In a world today where having a college education can mean the difference between a stable income and poverty, it seems absurd to change the application admittance process in such a way that takes away from equal opportunities for everyone to succeed.

    ReplyDelete